ScienceSkills
Workflow guide

A traceable literature review workflow

Move from a focused question to a source-backed evidence table.

ScienceSkills editorial guide · AI-assisted planning material, not a tested execution report.

1. Define the review question

Write the scope, population or system, outcomes and exclusions. Decide whether you need an exploratory review or a formally specified systematic-review protocol before searching.

2. Keep a search log

Record database names, exact queries and dates. Export identifiers and bibliographic records. Deduplicate by identifiers first, then inspect title and author matches.

3. Screen and extract evidence

Apply the same inclusion rules to every candidate. Build an extraction table with study design, sample size, relevant outcomes, limitations and a source location for each finding.

4. Verify the synthesis

Open each source and check the claim against its methods and results. Separate what a paper reports from your interpretation. Document unresolved contradictions instead of averaging them away.

Expected deliverables

A search log, a deduplicated bibliography, an exclusion log and an evidence table with source locations.

A starter prompt

Help me plan a literature review of [question]. First ask about scope and inclusion criteria. Produce a search log template and evidence-extraction table. Do not invent references; mark claims needing source verification.

Confirm details in the linked skill documentation and underlying tool references before use.

Skills to inspect

literature-review

Conducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources. Use for research synthesis, reproducible literature searches, screening, citation checking, or preparing Markdown and PDF reviews. Tracks search coverage, records versus studies, and evidence limitations; supports meta-analysis planning but does not supply a meta-analysis engine.

Literature & Research Workflow

citation-management

Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search OpenAlex, PubMed, and Google Scholar for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.

Literature & Research Workflow

scientific-critical-thinking

Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.

Literature & Research Workflow