ScienceSkills
Literature & Research Workflow

bgpt-paper-search

Searches BGPT scientific papers by topic or DOI and retrieves claim-level evidence extracted from full text, including experiments, reported statistics, scope, limitations, and provenance. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details beyond abstracts.

View source files ↗Set up this skill ↓

Use this skill in your project

This is a readable source snapshot, not a hosted execution service. Review the upstream files and your agent’s loading rules before installation.

  1. Get the repository and inspect SKILL.md and its referenced files.
  2. Copy the complete skill folder into your agent’s documented skill directory. The directory depends on your agent.
  3. Install the dependencies specified by the skill. API access, data and compute may carry separate costs.
  4. Start with a small input and verify the output before running a full analysis.
Repository download and setup guide →

A prompt to adapt

I want to use the bgpt-paper-search skill for [research task]. Read its SKILL.md and referenced files first. Ask about my input data, expected output and environment. Identify dependencies and credentials before proposing steps. Start with a small example and state how I can check the result.

License (source snapshot)MIT
Compatibility (source snapshot)Requires a configured remote BGPT MCP connection and internet access to bgpt.pro. A stdio bridge additionally needs Node.js/npm. Paid access requires a BGPT API key configured as an Authorization header.
Skill version (source snapshot)1.3
Last reviewed (source snapshot)2026-09-30
Author (source snapshot)BGPT
Source transparency
Documentation recovered from the site snapshot dated 17 October 2026. Upstream version fields below are source claims, not a new verification by ScienceSkills. No execution benchmark is claimed.

Skill documentation

When to use

Use BGPT to find full-text-derived evidence for a research question or a known DOI. It returns extracted claims and their supporting experiments, rather than only bibliographic metadata. Use these records to build a traceable evidence table; they are not a complete systematic-review search or a validated risk-of-bias assessment.

Connect

Configure BGPT in the host before use; installing this skill does not register an MCP server. The provider supports both transports:

Transport Endpoint
Streamable HTTP https://bgpt.pro/mcp/stream
SSE https://bgpt.pro/mcp/sse

Use the host's native remote-MCP configuration when supported. For a host that uses mcpServers JSON and requires a local stdio bridge, this configuration uses mcp-remote (adapt it to the host's actual settings format):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bgpt": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-remote", "https://bgpt.pro/mcp/stream", "--transport", "http-only"]
    }
  }
}

The published bgpt-mcp 1.1.0 npm package is a thin SSE wrapper around mcp-remote, not a local paper database. Its bundled README predates the current tool contract and pricing. Prefer the native connection or configurable bridge above. The linked BGPT GitHub repository was unavailable at review time; use the current provider documentation and live tool schema.

Free access needs no key. For paid usage, configure Authorization: Bearer <key> in the host's remote-server headers, using its credential storage. For the bridge, mcp-remote supports --header-file with a local credential file. Do not put api_key in an MCP tool call: neither current tool declares that argument. Authenticate through the connection.

Search and DOI lookup

Discover the connected server's tools before calling them. The live BGPT 2.14.7 schema reviewed on 2026-09-30 exposes:

Tool / argument Contract
search_papers.query Required string. Use short English search terms.
num_results Integer, 1–100; default 16. Set it explicitly to control result use.
days_back Optional integer; papers published within the last N days. Omit for all dates.
min_citations Optional integer; minimum number of references cited by the paper, not citations received.
study_type Optional string: primary study, systematic review, meta-analysis, narrative review, protocol, dataset, commentary, or other.
output_format evidence (default), full, or legacy.
lookup_paper.doi Required DOI string; also accepts output_format. A found paper counts as one result.

Use the filter arguments instead of putting years or filters into the query. No Boolean-query grammar, offset, page, or cursor is documented by this schema. A result limit is not pagination: do not invent continuation arguments or claim the search enumerates every matching paper. For broader coverage, run explicit question variants and deduplicate by DOI while retaining the query history.

Search example verified with one public result (invoke through the connected tool interface):

{"query": "CRISPR human cells", "num_results": 1, "output_format": "full"}

Illustrative filtered search (filters were schema-checked, not executed):

{"query": "CRISPR delivery neurons", "num_results": 5, "days_back": 90, "study_type": "primary study", "output_format": "evidence"}

For a paper already identified, call lookup_paper with its bare DOI rather than hoping a title search returns that exact paper:

{"doi": "10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.014", "output_format": "evidence"}

Do not interpret a connection, quota, or tool error as an empty evidence set. The provider publishes a result allowance, but no numeric request-rate limit on the reviewed page; avoid assuming unlimited request throughput.

Read the result contract

Search returns an envelope with a results list and count; record the returned query too, since the service may rewrite search terms. DOI lookup returns found and a single result; handle not-found before reading it. Inspect the MCP result for tool errors before interpreting the envelope.

  • evidence gives compact evidence records; empty optional fields may be absent.
  • full adds legacy paper metadata to the evidence record.
  • legacy requests the older paper metadata representation. Do not assume every paper has all previously advertised fields or a quality score.

The provider says evidence/full formats omit papers without extracted evidence. However, the live smoke test returned a record with schema_version: "legacy", extraction_status: "legacy", and an empty evidence_units list in both formats. A returned record therefore does not guarantee claim-level provenance. An empty search or unfound DOI also does not establish that the paper does not exist. Retain doi, title, publication_date, and publication_name when available, then inspect central_claim and evidence.evidence_units. Each unit links its claim to an experiment, reported statistics, demonstrated scope, and provenance. Keep the schema version: older records can have a different shape. Legacy full metadata can contain nulls, numeric strings, and serialized text instead of native lists; preserve the raw values and never execute them as code.

The provider documents V4 limits of five evidence units per record, two provenance passages per unit, and 320 characters per passage. These are bounded extractions, not the complete article. Check extraction_status, normalization_warnings, and evidence.record_provenance, including truncation information, before synthesis.

Evidence checks

For each extracted result, retain the DOI and source section, table, or figure. Verify sample sizes, units, experimental arms, reported statistics, and uncertainty against the paper before using them in a synthesis. Distinguish author-reported limitations from extraction-generated interpretations. Preserve contradictory or mixed evidence and demonstrated scope. If legacy quality scores are present, use them only as screening aids, not as a study-specific risk-of-bias assessment.

Allowance and review scope

At the review date the provider advertises 50 free results per network, then $0.02 per returned result. A successful DOI lookup counts as one result; unfound lookups cost none. Recheck the allowance and pricing before a large batch. Do not repeatedly retry a quota-exhausted request.

Sources: provider setup, record formats, and billing, live MCP endpoint, published BGPT wrapper metadata, and bridge documentation. The tool schemas, one-result full search, matching evidence-format DOI lookup, and SSE handshake were checked with unauthenticated requests. The public search/lookup returned a legacy-schema record, not a V4 fixture. Paid authentication, filtered search behavior, and host-specific configuration were not tested.

Explore related skills

arbor

Applies Arbor Hypothesis Tree Refinement to research artifacts with repeatable evaluators, including model training, agent harnesses, data synthesis and benchmark optimization. Uses persistent hypotheses, isolated experiments, evidence propagation and held-out candidate comparison for multi-experiment research runs. Includes a standard-library state manager and guidance for the RUC-NLPIR Arbor CLI.

Literature & Research Workflow

citation-management

Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search OpenAlex, PubMed, and Google Scholar for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.

Literature & Research Workflow

hypogenic

Plans and audits use of ChicagoHAI HypoGeniC/HypoRefine for LLM-assisted hypothesis generation from labeled text datasets. Use for the `hypogenic` package, its task configs, hypothesis banks, or HypoBench datasets—not for manual hypothesis formulation or scientific validation.

Literature & Research Workflow